Personal Injury Marketing Playbook

44.8% of TV is streaming. 90% household reach. 23% higher ROI than broadcast. 2025 playbook: CTV 35-45%, search 25-35%, SEO 15-20%. Integrate or underperform.

PI law firm marketing has changed substantially. What worked in 2020 doesn’t work the same way now. Here’s what’s actually driving growth in 2025.

The Market Reality

Legal advertising has become expensive and competitive:

The response: sophisticated firms are building systems. Create demand (not just capture it). Measure everything. Integrate channels into cohesive strategies.

The Channel Mix That’s Working

CTV: The Awareness Engine

CTV has become central to PI marketing:

CTV creates demand. 62% of consumers discover new brands through TV advertising. For PI firms, this means being the firm people think of first when they need help.

Strategic role: Top of funnel awareness, brand building, demand generation

Search: The Capture System

Search captures demand that CTV creates:

  • Branded search: Protect your name, capture TV-generated interest
  • Generic search: Compete for active injury searchers
  • Local Services Ads: Google-screened presence with pay-per-lead

75% of consumers search after seeing TV ads. Without search protection, competitors capture demand you created.

Strategic role: Demand capture, conversion, competitor defense

SEO: The Foundation

Organic search remains valuable:

  • Lower marginal cost per lead than paid
  • Builds over time, compounds
  • Local pack presence for “near me” searches
  • Supports branded search queries

But SEO alone can’t create demand. It captures existing intent.

Strategic role: Baseline presence, long-term efficiency, credibility

Social: Targeted Supplement

Paid social serves specific purposes:

  • Retargeting CTV-exposed households
  • Case-type specific campaigns (mass tort recruitment)
  • Geographic targeting for local awareness
  • Creative testing before CTV production

Organic social builds brand but rarely generates leads directly for PI.

Strategic role: Retargeting, supplemental awareness, creative development

Budget Allocation Framework

How leading firms are allocating:

ChannelBudget %Purpose
CTV35-45%Demand creation
Search (branded + generic)25-35%Demand capture
SEO15-20%Foundation
Social/retargeting5-10%Supplemental
Creative production10-15%Annual

This is a departure from the search-dominant budgets of five years ago. The shift reflects recognition that creating demand (CTV) provides leverage that pure capture (search) can’t. See our PI marketing budget allocation guide for detailed frameworks.

The Integration Imperative

Channels working together outperform channels in silos:

CTV → Search integration: (See our branded search protection guide/)

  • CTV generates branded searches
  • Branded search campaigns capture that demand
  • Attribution connects the system
  • System CPL lower than either channel alone

CTV → Retargeting integration:

  • Identify CTV-exposed households
  • Retarget across social, display
  • Multiple touchpoints before conversion

Search → CRM integration:

  • Track leads to signed cases
  • Calculate true cost per case
  • Optimize for case value, not just lead volume

Firms running integrated systems see 40% more website visits from CTV-exposed households than firms running channels independently.

Technology That Matters

Attribution Platforms

Multi-touch attribution connecting CTV exposure to conversions:

  • MNTN, Tatari for CTV-specific
  • Rockerbox, Measured for cross-channel
  • Google Analytics 4 for basic multi-touch

Call Tracking

Every phone number tracked:

  • CallRail, Invoca, Dial800
  • Integration with CTV platforms
  • Integration with CRM

CRM Integration

Closed-loop tracking from impression to case:

  • Salesforce, HubSpot, legal-specific CRMs
  • Lead source tracking through intake
  • Case value attribution back to channel

Creative Tools

AI-assisted production reducing costs:

  • Faster iteration on concepts
  • Lower-cost video production
  • Personalization at scale

What’s Not Working

Search-Only Strategies

Firms relying solely on Google Ads face:

  • Rising CPCs (competition intensifying)
  • Limited scale (only so much search volume)
  • No demand creation (just capture)
  • Vulnerability to bid competition

Broadcast-Only Television

Traditional TV without CTV misses:

  • Growing streaming audience
  • Targeting precision
  • Attribution capability
  • Optimization opportunity

Channel Silos

Separate agencies for each channel without coordination:

  • Attribution conflicts
  • Timing misalignment
  • Budget competition instead of optimization
  • System-level inefficiency

The Competitive Landscape

Top-spending PI advertisers continue to dominate airtime, but CTV creates opportunities:

For challengers:

  • CTV targeting avoids direct mass-market competition
  • Precision reach beats brute-force spending
  • Measurable ROI justifies investment
  • Exclusive audiences provide competitive moats

Market dynamics:

  • Biggest spenders still dominate broadcast
  • CTV opens targeted niches
  • Attribution proves ROI for growing firms
  • System thinkers outperform channel tacticians

Metrics That Matter

Leading indicators:

  • CTV verified visit rate
  • Branded search volume trend
  • Website conversion rate
  • Lead response time

Lagging indicators:

  • Cost per lead
  • Lead-to-case conversion rate
  • Cost per signed case
  • Case value by channel

System metrics:

  • Blended CPL across channels
  • Attribution-adjusted ROI by channel
  • Market share of branded searches
  • Year-over-year case volume growth

The 2025 Playbook Summary

  1. Build awareness through CTV. Create demand, don’t just capture it
  2. Protect every search. Branded terms are your highest-ROI capture point
  3. Integrate, don’t silo. Channels work together or they underperform
  4. Measure to cases. Leads are nice; signed cases pay bills
  5. Optimize continuously. Static campaigns lose to dynamic systems
  6. Invest in creative. Good creative multiplies media efficiency
  7. Think long-term. Brand building compounds; tactics don’t

References