In most markets, one or two firms control 20-30% of legal advertising. Morgan & Morgan dominates the Southeast. Thomas J. Henry owns San Antonio. Morris Bart runs Louisiana.
Seattle is different. The top spender has 8.1% market share.
The Numbers
- Monthly Spend: $2,619,198
- YoY Growth: +20.2%
- Channel Mix: Broadcast 55% | Cable 18% | CTV 27%
- DMA Rank: 13 (Major market)
Top 5 Advertisers:
| Firm | Monthly Spend | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Dubin Law Group | $212,127 | 8.1% |
| The Advocates Injury | $161,758 | 6.2% |
| Pendergast Law | $146,739 | 5.6% |
| Dimopoulos Injury | $138,082 | 5.3% |
| Bernard Law Group | $119,253 | 4.6% |
The top 5 combined control less than 30% of the market. That’s rare.
Why Seattle Is Fragmented
A few factors:
- Tech-forward market. Higher CTV adoption (27%) suggests audience behavior is ahead of advertiser behavior.
- No regional powerhouse. Unlike Florida (Morgan), Texas (Henry), or Louisiana (Bart), the Pacific Northwest lacks a dominant legal advertiser.
- Growth attracts entrants. 20.2% YoY growth means new players are testing the market.
The Opportunity
Seattle is a rare combination:
- Fast-growing. 20.2% increase year-over-year.
- Fragmented. No firm owns more than 8%.
- CTV-friendly. 27% streaming adoption, tech-savvy audience.
In a market like this, consistent CTV presence can build household recognition without competing against entrenched broadcast budgets. There’s no Morgan to out-spend. Just a level playing field where the smartest strategy wins.