CTV vs YouTube Ads: Which is Better for Lawyers?
By Jared Reagan
Updated: 1/6/2026
4 min read
Quick Answer
CTV delivers 95%+ completion rates in a lean-back TV environment at $25-35 CPM. YouTube offers sophisticated targeting and lower CPMs ($15-25) but 20-40% skip rates on mobile. For brand building, CTV wins. For retargeting and younger demographics, YouTube has advantages. Most firms should use both.
Both channels put video in front of potential clients. But the experience, attention, and outcomes differ significantly.
Here's how to think about the choice — and why most firms shouldn't choose at all.
The Core Difference
CTV (Connected TV):
- Big screen, lean-back viewing
- Non-skippable ads
- 95%+ completion rates
- Premium content environment
- $25-35 CPM typical
YouTube:
- Mostly mobile/desktop viewing
- Skippable ads (usually)
- 20-40% completion on skippable
- User-generated + premium content
- $15-25 CPM typical
The fundamental distinction: CTV is television advertising with digital targeting. YouTube is digital advertising that sometimes appears on TVs.
Attention and Completion
CTV Attention Metrics
| Metric | CTV Performance |
|---|---|
| Completion rate | 95%+ |
| Screen size | Large (TV) |
| Viewing context | Lean-back, relaxed |
| Multi-tasking | Lower |
| Sound on | Almost always |
CTV ads run full-screen, non-skippable, in content people chose to watch. The viewer has committed to watching — they're on the couch, remote in hand, engaged with programming.
YouTube Attention Metrics
| Metric | YouTube Performance |
|---|---|
| Completion rate (skippable) | 20-40% |
| Completion rate (non-skip) | 90%+ |
| Primary device | Mobile (70%+) |
| Viewing context | Active browsing |
| Multi-tasking | Higher |
| Sound on | Often off on mobile |
YouTube's skippable TrueView ads let viewers skip after 5 seconds. Most do. Non-skippable bumper ads (6 seconds) and in-stream ads perform better but limit creative options.
The Attention Gap
YouTube reaches more people. CTV reaches people more effectively.
A 30-second CTV ad that's watched completely delivers your full message. A YouTube ad skipped at 5 seconds delivers... your logo, maybe.
Effective reach comparison:
- 100,000 CTV impressions × 95% completion = 95,000 completed views
- 100,000 YouTube impressions × 30% completion = 30,000 completed views
You need 3x the YouTube impressions to match CTV's completed view volume.
Cost Comparison
Raw CPM
| Platform | Typical CPM | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| CTV (premium) | $35-45 | Hulu, Peacock, Netflix |
| CTV (mid-tier) | $25-35 | Prime Video, general streaming |
| CTV (FAST) | $15-25 | Tubi, Pluto TV |
| YouTube CTV | $25-30 | YouTube on TV screens |
| YouTube (general) | $15-25 | All devices |
YouTube looks cheaper on CPM. But CPM doesn't account for completion.
Cost Per Completed View
| Platform | CPM | Completion | Effective CPCV |
|---|---|---|---|
| CTV | $30 | 95% | $0.032 |
| YouTube (skippable) | $20 | 30% | $0.067 |
| YouTube (non-skip) | $25 | 90% | $0.028 |
When you factor completion rates, the cost gap narrows significantly. CTV's "expensive" CPM delivers efficiently because people actually watch.
Targeting Capabilities
YouTube Targeting
YouTube's Google integration provides sophisticated targeting:
- Demographics: Age, gender, household income, parental status
- Interests: Affinity audiences, in-market audiences
- Custom intent: People who searched specific terms on Google
- Remarketing: People who visited your website
- Similar audiences: Lookalikes of your converters
- Placement: Specific channels or videos
The custom intent targeting is powerful — reach people who searched "car accident lawyer" on Google, then show them video ads on YouTube.
CTV Targeting
CTV targeting varies by platform but generally includes:
- Demographics: Age, gender, household income
- Geography: DMA, zip code, radius
- Behavioral: Purchase data, lifestyle segments
- Contextual: Content genre, daypart
- First-party: Platform-specific data (Amazon purchase behavior, etc.)
CTV can't match YouTube's search intent targeting. But platforms like Amazon (Freevee/Prime Video) offer purchase behavior data that YouTube lacks.
Targeting Winner
YouTube wins on targeting precision, especially for retargeting and search intent signals. CTV wins on attention per impression delivered.
Screen and Context
The TV Screen Advantage
CTV ads appear on the largest screen in the house. This matters for:
- Credibility: TV advertising signals legitimacy
- Visibility: Larger creative canvas
- Attention: Harder to ignore than mobile
- Environment: Premium content adjacency
YouTube's Screen Reality
Despite YouTube CTV growth, most YouTube viewing is mobile:
- 70%+ of YouTube watch time is mobile/desktop
- Mobile viewing often happens with sound off
- Smaller screen = less visual impact
- Easier to scroll away or multitask
YouTube CTV (YouTube on TV screens) delivers better attention but represents a minority of YouTube inventory.
Use Case Comparison
When CTV Wins
Brand building: You want people to remember your firm name when they need a lawyer. CTV's completed views and TV-screen presence build recognition more effectively than skipped mobile ads.
Market awareness: Launching in a new market or building presence against established competitors. CTV's frequency and completion create awareness YouTube skips undermine.
Premium positioning: Your brand matters. Appearing alongside prestige content (Hulu originals, NFL games) signals quality in ways YouTube pre-roll doesn't.
Older demographics: Adults 45+ over-index on streaming TV and under-index on YouTube. CTV reaches them where they actually watch.
When YouTube Wins
Retargeting: Someone visited your website. Now show them video ads across YouTube. This warm-audience targeting drives high intent at reasonable cost.
Search intent: Reach people who searched legal terms on Google. Custom intent audiences let you target based on demonstrated need.
Younger demographics: Adults 18-34 live on YouTube. If your practice serves younger clients, YouTube reaches them.
Budget constraints: At $5K/month, YouTube goes further than CTV. Lower CPMs and flexible budgets make testing accessible.
Direct response: YouTube's click-to-website capability supports direct response campaigns. CTV is pure awareness with no click path.
The Integration Argument
Smart firms don't choose — they integrate.
How They Work Together
CTV builds, YouTube converts:
- CTV creates broad awareness in your market
- YouTube retargets website visitors with video
- Warm leads see consistent messaging across screens
Frequency across screens:
- Viewer sees CTV ad on their TV
- Same viewer sees YouTube ad on their phone
- Multiple touchpoints reinforce the message
Funnel coverage:
- CTV: Top of funnel (awareness)
- YouTube custom intent: Mid-funnel (interest)
- YouTube retargeting: Bottom-funnel (consideration)
Budget Allocation Example
For a $30K monthly video budget:
| Channel | Allocation | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| CTV | $20K (67%) | Brand awareness, market presence |
| YouTube retargeting | $5K (17%) | Convert website visitors |
| YouTube custom intent | $5K (17%) | Reach legal searchers |
This approach uses each channel's strength: CTV for attention-rich awareness, YouTube for targeting precision.
Platform-Specific Considerations
YouTube CTV
YouTube on TV screens (via smart TVs, streaming devices) delivers CTV-like attention with YouTube's targeting. If you're choosing between platforms:
- YouTube CTV: Better targeting, Google data integration
- Traditional CTV: Better content adjacency, broader streaming reach
YouTube Shorts
6-second vertical videos reaching mobile-first audiences. Different creative requirements, different metrics. Worth testing for younger PI demographics.
CTV Sports
Live sports on streaming (NFL on Peacock, UFC on Paramount+) commands premium attention. YouTube can't match live sports inventory.
Measurement Differences
CTV Attribution
- View-through website visits
- Branded search lift
- Direct traffic increase
- Halo effect on other channels
CTV attribution is modeled and estimated. You won't see "clicked ad → called" tracking.
YouTube Attribution
- View-through conversions
- Click-through conversions
- Website visit tracking
- Google Ads integration
YouTube's Google integration provides clearer attribution paths, especially for website-focused campaigns.
The Bottom Line
Choose CTV when:
- Brand building is the primary goal
- Completion rates matter more than CPM
- Premium content adjacency has value
- Audience skews 35+
- Budget supports $15K+/month
Choose YouTube when:
- Retargeting website visitors
- Reaching legal searchers (custom intent)
- Budget is limited (under $10K/month)
- Audience skews younger
- Direct response metrics required
Choose both when:
- Budget supports diversified video ($25K+)
- You want full-funnel coverage
- Building awareness while capturing intent
- Maximizing frequency across screens
The channels aren't competitors — they're complements. CTV builds the awareness that YouTube converts.
Planning your video advertising strategy? Let's discuss channel mix for your specific goals and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Answers
Want the complete picture?
Read our Complete Guide →Ready to Explore CTV for Your Firm?
Get a free market analysis showing streaming viewership in your DMA.
Schedule a Call