Mass Tort vs PI: CTV Differences

Same platforms, different strategies. Mass tort: campaign bursts, national reach. Traditional PI: ongoing local awareness. Run both? Separate everything.

Mass tort and traditional PI use the same CTV platforms but require fundamentally different strategies. Understanding the differences prevents applying the wrong playbook.

Core Strategic Differences

FactorTraditional PIMass Tort
AudienceEveryone might need youSpecific affected population
TimingOngoing (accidents happen continuously)Campaign-based (inventory lifecycle)
GeographyLocal marketOften regional or national
Message”We’re here when you need us""Did you use X? Call now”
UrgencyVariableOften statute-driven
CreativeBrand buildingDirect response

Targeting Differences

Traditional PI Targeting

Goal: Build awareness among potential future clients

Approach:

  • Geographic focus (your service area)
  • Behavioral signals (auto loans, motorcycle owners)
  • Broad coverage with relevance layers
  • Consistent, ongoing presence

Audience definition: “Households in our market with injury risk signals”

Mass Tort Targeting

Goal: Reach specific affected populations

Approach:

  • Health/pharmaceutical data (drug users)
  • Geographic (exposure sites)
  • Demographic (age, condition prevalence)
  • Precision above reach

Audience definition: “Households with [Drug X] users or [Condition Y] sufferers in [Region Z]”

The specificity is dramatically different.

Creative Differences

Option A

Option B

Visual Treatment

ElementTraditional PIMass Tort
Attorney presenceOften featuredSometimes optional
EmotionHigh (empathy)Moderate (concern)
Information densityLowHigh
Call to actionSubtleProminent
Phone numberImportantDominant

Campaign Structure Differences

Traditional PI Campaign

Duration: Ongoing (12+ months) Pacing: Consistent monthly spend Creative rotation: Every 6-12 months Optimization: Continuous refinement

Mass Tort Campaign

Duration: Campaign-specific (3-9 months typical) Pacing: Front-loaded or deadline-driven Creative rotation: Limited (campaign-specific) Optimization: Aggressive early, maintenance later

Budget Allocation Differences

Traditional PI Budget

Channel%Purpose
CTV35-45%Awareness
Search (branded)10-15%Capture
Search (generic)15-20%Capture
SEO15-20%Foundation
Retargeting5-10%Reinforcement

Mass Tort Budget

Channel%Purpose
Broadcast TV40-50%Mass reach
CTV20-30%Targeted precision
Digital/Search20-30%Capture
Qualification-Lead processing

Mass tort typically includes larger broadcast component for scale.

Measurement Differences

Traditional PI Metrics

MetricFocus
Verified visitsTraffic generation
Branded search volumeAwareness building
Cost per leadEfficiency
Lead-to-caseQuality
Cost per caseUltimate ROI

Mass Tort Metrics

MetricFocus
LeadsVolume
Qualification rateLead quality
Cost per qualified leadTrue acquisition cost
Retainer rateConversion
Cost per retainerUltimate ROI

Mass tort adds qualification layer between lead and case.

Firm Structure Implications

Traditional PI Operations

  • Local intake team
  • Direct client relationships
  • Case-by-case handling
  • Ongoing marketing investment

Mass Tort Operations

  • High-volume intake capacity
  • Qualification screening processes
  • Often co-counsel arrangements
  • Campaign-based marketing

Firms running both need separate operational tracks.

When CTV Favors Each Approach

CTV Strong for Traditional PI

  • Local targeting precision
  • Behavioral relevance signals
  • Attribution to case level
  • Long-term brand building
  • Integration with search

CTV Strong for Mass Tort

  • Precision targeting (vs. broadcast spray)
  • Health/pharma data availability
  • Geographic cluster targeting
  • Measurable response attribution
  • Cost efficiency in targeted populations

Running Both Simultaneously

Many firms do traditional PI and mass tort:

Separation Requirements

  • Separate campaigns
  • Separate budgets
  • Separate creative
  • Separate landing pages
  • Separate tracking

Shared Elements

  • Brand consistency
  • Compliance processes
  • Call tracking infrastructure
  • Attribution methodology

Attention Allocation

Mass tort is campaign-intensive. Don’t let it distract from ongoing PI brand building. They serve different timelines.

Strategic Choice

Firm Considerations

FactorFavors Traditional PIFavors Mass Tort
Local rootsStrong local brandLess important
Case capacitySteady flowHigh-volume bursts
CapitalConsistent investmentCampaign funding
OperationsRelationship-focusedProcess-focused
TimelineLong-term buildingCampaign returns

Most established PI firms maintain traditional PI while selectively pursuing mass tort opportunities.

For traditional PI strategy, see the CTV advertising guide.

For mass tort specifics, see the mass tort CTV guide.

References

Strategy comparison based on campaign performance data and industry best practices.