CTV Attribution and Measurement for Law Firms
"How do you know CTV is working?" Track household exposure to site visits. Verified visits, conversions, cost-per-lead, all without cookies or clicks.
“How do you know if CTV is working?”
This is the question every law firm asks, and the right question to ask. Unlike search advertising where you can track click to conversion, CTV requires different measurement approaches.
This guide covers how CTV attribution works, what you can measure, and how to prove ROI.
The Measurement Challenge
Why CTV Is Different
Option A
Option B
What happens between exposure and conversion isn’t a click. It’s memory, recognition, and action that happens later, often on a different device. Understanding second-screen behavior, how viewers grab their phones while watching, is key to tracking this journey.
The Attribution Gap
Traditional digital attribution relies on cookies and clicks. CTV has neither:
- No clicking on a TV ad
- No cookies on a streaming device
- Different device than where conversion happens
Solving this requires different methods.
How CTV Attribution Works
Household Matching
The foundation of CTV attribution is matching TV exposure to website/conversion activity.
The Attribution Process
Exposure Capture
When your ad serves, the platform records: IP address of the streaming device, device ID, timestamp, and ad served.
Website Activity Capture
When someone visits your site, your pixel captures: IP address, device information, timestamp, and actions taken.
Matching
Platform compares exposure data to website data. Same IP within attribution window = household match. Exposure + visit = verified visit.
Matching Methods
IP-based matching: Same IP address = same household. High accuracy for same-session behavior, decreases over time (dynamic IPs).
Device graph matching: Data companies build maps of devices in households. CTV device linked to mobile and desktop devices. Enables cross-device attribution.
Deterministic matching: Logged-in user on streaming app matches to logged-in user elsewhere. Highest accuracy but limited volume.
Attribution Windows
How long after exposure can a conversion be attributed?
| Window | Use Case | Trade-off |
|---|---|---|
| 7 days | Conservative | May miss legitimate conversions |
| 14 days | Balanced | Standard for most campaigns |
| 21 days | Extended | Appropriate for PI |
| 30 days | Long | Risk of coincidental attribution |
For personal injury, 14-21 days is appropriate. The consideration cycle isn’t instant.
What You Can Measure
Delivery Metrics
Impressions: Number of times your ad served
Reach: Unique households exposed
Frequency: Average exposures per household
Completion rate: Percentage who watched the full ad (typically 95%+ on CTV)
Response Metrics
Verified visits: Households exposed to your ad that subsequently visited your website.
Verified visit rate (VVR): Verified visits ÷ impressions × 100
Benchmark: 0.4-1.0% for well-targeted campaigns
Conversions: Form submissions, phone calls, chat initiations from verified visitors.
Efficiency Metrics
Cost per verified visit: Media spend ÷ verified visits Benchmark: $30-75
Cost per lead (CPL): Total spend ÷ leads generated Benchmark: $200-500 for PI
Cost per case (CPA): Total spend ÷ signed cases Benchmark: $1,500-4,000 for PI
Verified Visits Explained
For a deep dive into this metric, see CTV verified visits explained.
What Counts as a Verified Visit
A verified visit is recorded when:
- Household was exposed to your ad
- Someone from that household visited your website
- Visit occurred within attribution window
- Platform successfully matched the exposure to the visit
What Verified Visits Tell You
High VVR (0.8%+):
- Targeting is reaching interested households
- Creative is resonating
- Campaign is working
Medium VVR (0.4-0.7%):
- Reasonable performance
- Room for optimization
Low VVR (under 0.3%):
- Targeting may be too broad
- Creative may not be resonating
- Technical issues possible
Verified Visit Limitations
What’s not captured:
- Phone calls without website visit
- Store visits
- Actions after attribution window
- Users with VPNs or privacy tools
Verified visits are a floor, not a ceiling. Actual impact is likely higher.
Call Attribution
Proper CTV and call tracking integration is critical for law firms where phone calls drive most conversions.
Why Calls Matter for Law Firms
For PI firms, phone calls are often the primary conversion. If you’re only measuring website conversions, you’re missing the picture.
Call Tracking Integration
How it works:
- Call tracking platform (CallRail, Invoca) provides unique numbers
- CTV platform integrates with call tracking
- When call occurs, systems attempt to match caller to exposed household
- Matched calls are attributed to CTV
Methods:
- IP matching (caller’s device to CTV exposure)
- Phone number matching (if number shown in ad)
- Manual attribution (ask “how did you hear about us?”)
Implementation
Dynamic number insertion: Different numbers shown in different contexts, enabling source tracking.
CTV-specific numbers: Dedicated number for CTV creative, all calls attributed to CTV.
Integrated tracking: CallRail/Invoca integrated with CTV platform for automated matching.
Multi-Touch Attribution
Understanding multi-touch attribution for CTV campaigns is essential for accurately crediting your marketing channels.
The Multi-Touch Reality
Real conversion paths involve multiple touchpoints:
- CTV ad exposure (day 1)
- Google search for firm name (day 5)
- Website visit (day 5)
- Retargeting ad (day 7)
- Direct website visit (day 10)
- Phone call (day 10)
Which channel gets credit?
Attribution Models
Last-touch: 100% credit to final touchpoint (phone call). Problem: CTV gets zero credit, looks ineffective.
First-touch: 100% credit to first touchpoint (CTV). Problem: Ignores conversion contribution.
Position-based (recommended): 40% to first touch, 40% to last touch, 20% to middle. CTV gets appropriate credit for initiating the journey.
Data-driven: Algorithm determines credit based on patterns. Requires significant data volume.
For Law Firms
Position-based (40/20/40) is typically best:
- Credits CTV for awareness creation
- Credits search/conversion for capturing demand
- Acknowledges middle touchpoints
Incrementality Testing
What It Measures
Attribution tells you what happened. Incrementality tells you what would have happened without CTV.
Question: Did CTV cause conversions, or would they have happened anyway?
Test Design
Holdout method:
- Test group: Exposed to CTV ads
- Control group: Not exposed
- Compare: Conversion rates between groups
Incremental lift = Test rate - Control rate
When to Use
Good candidates:
- Significant CTV investment ($50K+/month)
- Need to prove value to stakeholders
- Considering major budget changes
Not necessary:
- Smaller campaigns
- Clear performance metrics already
- Testing cost exceeds value of certainty
Interpreting Results
| Lift | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| 0-10% | Minimal incremental effect |
| 10-25% | Moderate effect |
| 25-50% | Strong effect |
| 50%+ | Very strong effect |
Reporting Framework
What to Track Weekly
- Impressions delivered
- Pacing vs. plan
- Verified visits
- Conversions
- Spend vs. budget
What to Track Monthly
- Reach and frequency
- VVR trend
- CPL and CPA
- Attribution analysis
- Creative performance
What to Report to Stakeholders
Keep it simple:
- Spend: $X
- Leads generated: Y
- Cost per lead: $Z
- Cases signed: N
- Cost per case: $M
Add context:
- Trend vs. previous period
- Comparison to other channels
- Qualitative observations
Avoid
- Drowning in metrics
- Reporting impressions as success (vanity metric)
- Claiming certainty where there’s estimation
- Comparing incomparable channels (apples to oranges)
Technical Implementation
Required Setup
Website pixel: CTV platform pixel on your website to capture visits.
Conversion tracking: Form submissions, call tracking integrated.
GA4 connection: CTV platform → GA4 for unified view.
CRM integration: Leads attributed to source, tracked through to case.
Platform Integration
| Integration | Purpose |
|---|---|
| CTV platform ↔ Website | Verified visits |
| CTV platform ↔ CallRail | Call attribution |
| CTV platform ↔ GA4 | Unified analytics |
| GA4 ↔ CRM | Lead to case tracking |
Common Technical Issues
Pixel not firing: No verified visits recorded. Check implementation.
Call tracking disconnected: Calls not attributed. Check integration.
Attribution window mismatch: Platform and analysis using different windows. Standardize.
Duplicate counting: Same conversion counted multiple times. Deduplicate.
ROI Calculation
For detailed methodology, see calculating CTV ROI for personal injury firms.
The Formula
CTV ROI = (Revenue from CTV-attributed cases - CTV costs) / CTV costs × 100
Working Example
| Input | Value |
|---|---|
| Monthly CTV spend | $35,000 |
| Management/production (amortized) | $5,000 |
| Total monthly cost | $40,000 |
| CTV-attributed leads | 65 |
| Lead to case rate | 25% |
| Cases | 16 |
| Average case value | $12,000 |
| Revenue | $192,000 |
ROI: ($192,000 - $40,000) / $40,000 = 380%
ROAS: $192,000 / $40,000 = 4.8x
ROI Timeline
CTV ROI isn’t immediate:
Month 1: Building awareness, few conversions Month 2-3: Conversions building, ROI improving Month 4+: Mature performance, stable ROI
And cases take months to resolve. True ROI is realized over 1-2+ years.
The Taqtics Approach
We build measurement into every campaign:
Attribution setup: Pixel, call tracking, integrations configured properly from day one.
Multi-touch modeling: Position-based attribution so CTV gets appropriate credit.
Transparent reporting: You see all the data: impressions, visits, conversions, costs.
Honest assessment: We’ll tell you what we can measure precisely and what involves estimation.
Continuous improvement: Use data to optimize, not just report.
Next Steps
References
-
IAB. “2025 Digital Video Ad Spend & Strategy Report.” 2025. https://www.iab.com/insights/video-ad-spend-report-2025/
-
IAB. “2024 Digital Video Ad Spend & Strategy Report (Full Report PDF).” July 2024. https://www.iab.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/2024_IAB_Video_Ad_Spend_Report_July_2024.pdf
-
MNTN. “What Today’s Insights Tell Us About 2024’s Connected TV Trends.” May 2024. https://mountain.com/blog/2024-connected-tv-trends/
-
Nielsen. “The Gauge: Traditional TV Gets a Boost in January 2025.” January 2025. https://www.nielsen.com/news-center/2025/the-gauge-traditional-tv-gets-a-boost-from-football-and-news-in-january-2025/
-
eMarketer. “Connected TV Continues to Redefine TV Advertising.” June 2025. https://www.emarketer.com/content/connected-tv-continues-redefine-tv-advertising
Put this into practice
Reading guides is one thing. Implementing them is another. We'll build this infrastructure for your firm.
Book a Strategy Call