Print advertising (newspapers, magazines, directories) was once essential for law firms. Now it’s a small slice of most marketing budgets. Here’s how print compares to CTV and when each still makes sense.
The Print Landscape
Print’s Decline
- Newspaper circulation down dramatically
- Magazine readership shrinking
- Yellow Pages largely irrelevant
- Digital has absorbed attention
What Remains
- Local newspapers (reduced but existing)
- Niche publications
- Community publications
- Legal directories (mostly online now)
Reach Comparison
Option A
Option B
For broad awareness, CTV dramatically outreaches print.
Engagement Comparison
CTV Engagement
- 94-96% completion rates
- Full audio-visual experience
- 15-30 second exposure
- Emotional impact possible
Print Engagement
- Seconds of attention (if noticed)
- Static image and text
- Reader controls pace
- Easy to skip/ignore
CTV commands attention. Print hopes for attention.
Cost Comparison
| Factor | CTV | |
|---|---|---|
| CPM | $35-50 | Varies widely |
| Production | $15,000-35,000 | $1,000-5,000 |
| Minimum buy | $15,000-25,000/month | $500-5,000/placement |
| Measurement | Strong | Very weak |
Print is cheaper but delivers far less per dollar.
Measurement Comparison
CTV Measurement
- Verified visits
- Attribution tracking
- Branded search correlation
- Accountable ROI
Print Measurement
- “How did you hear about us?” (if they remember)
- Unique phone numbers (some tracking)
- Very limited attribution
- Largely unmeasurable
62% of consumers discover brands via TV. Print discovery is rarely tracked.
Targeting Comparison
CTV Targeting
- Geographic precision
- Behavioral signals
- Household-level
- Advanced segmentation
Print Targeting
- Publication’s readership
- Geographic (newspaper coverage area)
- Basic demographic (publication audience)
- Very limited precision
When Print Still Works
Local Community Publications
- Hyper-local focus
- Community credibility
- Low cost presence
- Specific neighborhood reach
Niche Publications
- Industry-specific (trucking, construction)
- Case-type alignment
- Targeted professional audiences
- Credibility in niche
Directories (Selective)
- Still referenced by some
- Declining rapidly
- May make sense for specific demographics
Credibility Plays
- “As seen in…” value
- Reprints for office
- Social proof element
When CTV Wins
For Awareness
CTV provides what print can’t:
- Scale of reach
- Emotional impact
- Brand building
- Measurable results
For ROI
CTV delivers accountable performance:
- Track from impression to case
- Optimize based on data
- Justify investment
For Modern Audiences
People don’t read print ads:
- Attention has shifted
- Video is expected
- Digital natives ignore print
Budget Allocation Reality
For most PI firms today:
| Channel | Budget Share |
|---|---|
| CTV | 35-45% |
| Search | 25-35% |
| SEO | 15-20% |
| 0-5% | |
| Other | 5-10% |
Print is optional, marginal at best.
The Exception Cases
Print Might Get Budget If:
- Specific niche publication aligns perfectly
- Very local community presence matters
- Budget is very small (print cheaper entry)
- Credibility/social proof specific need
Print Shouldn’t Get Budget If:
- At expense of CTV presence
- For broad awareness goals
- Without clear niche alignment
- Based on “we’ve always done it”
The Practical Approach
If Considering Print
Do:
- Evaluate specific publication value
- Negotiate rates (print desperate for advertisers)
- Track with unique phone/URL
- View as supplementary
Don’t:
- Replace CTV with print
- Expect significant lead volume
- Invest without tracking attempt
- Assume print builds brand like TV
If Currently Running Print
Evaluate:
- What leads come from print? (really)
- What’s the cost per lead?
- Is there tracking in place?
- Would CTV budget serve better?
Consider:
- Shifting print budget to CTV
- Reducing print to true niche value
- Eliminating low-performing print
- Keeping only what demonstrably works
The Honest Assessment
✅ CTV Delivers
- + Modern audience reach: 90% of households
- + Measurable performance: verified attribution
- + Brand building capability: visual + audio storytelling
- + Growing viewership: where audiences are going
📰 Print Is
- − Legacy habit: 'we've always done it'
- − Marginal at best: minimal lead volume
- − Unmeasurable: no real attribution
- − Declining in value: shrinking readership
The comparison heavily favors CTV for most marketing objectives.
For complete channel comparison, see the CTV vs traditional advertising guide.
References
- Nielsen. (2025). Connected TV: Transforming advertising trends. https://www.nielsen.com/insights/2025/connected-tv-transforming-advertising-trends/
- IAB & Innovid. (2022). CTV takes center stage. https://www.iab.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Innovid_CTV-Takes-Center-Stage.pdf
- MNTN Research. (2025). 62% of consumers discover new brands through TV. https://research.mountain.com/insights/62-of-consumers-discover-new-brands-or-products-through-tv/