Atlanta Legal Advertising 2026

Atlanta leads all markets with 48% streaming adoption. $12.9M monthly, with Montlick and Morgan battling for the top. Here's why Atlanta is the future.

Atlanta isn’t just a large legal advertising market. It’s the most CTV-forward we track. Nearly half of all legal ad spend goes to streaming. This is the future playing out in real time.

The Numbers

Atlanta Legal Advertising (Dec 2025)
$12.9M monthly legal ad spend Source: MediaMonitors
48% goes to streaming Source: MediaMonitors
31% goes to traditional TV Source: MediaMonitors

Channel Mix:

  • Streaming: 48% (highest in nation)
  • Television: 31%
  • Radio: 19%
  • Cable: 2%

Top 10 Advertisers:

RankFirmMonthly SpendShareRadio %TV %Streaming %
1Morgan & Morgan$2,237,88417.4%13%46%37%
2Montlick Injury Attorneys$2,110,94516.4%5%41%54%
3Thompson Law$1,400,97010.9%0%31%69%
4Gary Martin Hays & Associates$1,398,46710.9%9%40%51%
5Kenneth S Nugent$1,294,25310.1%19%21%60%
6John Foy & Associates$953,3937.4%19%14%62%
7Dennis Law Firm$650,6205.1%4%21%75%
8Dozier Law Firm$413,5383.2%0%19%81%
9Julian Lewis Sanders$323,7982.5%100%0%0%
10My 25% Lawyer$220,3981.7%100%0%0%

The top 8 all invest in streaming (37-81%). Only the bottom 2 are radio-only holdouts.

Why Atlanta Leads

Several factors make Atlanta the streaming capital:

  1. Tech-forward demographics. Younger, more digital-native population.
  2. Competitive pressure. When one firm moves to streaming, others follow.
  3. Morgan vs Montlick battle. National brand vs local powerhouse driving innovation.
  4. Results visibility. CTV attribution proves ROI, justifying more investment.

The Leaders

Thompson Law (69% streaming): The most streaming-forward major advertiser in the market. At $1.4M monthly, they’re proving you can scale a CTV-dominant strategy.

Montlick (54% streaming): Atlanta’s homegrown PI brand has embraced streaming. Direct competition with Morgan & Morgan on their own terms.

Morgan & Morgan (37% streaming): Even the national leader is allocating 37% to streaming in Atlanta, more than their national average. The market demands it.

What This Means

Atlanta shows what happens when sophisticated advertisers compete:

  1. Streaming adoption accelerates. 48% allocation vs 12% national average.
  2. Traditional TV share drops. Only 31% broadcast vs 50%+ in most markets.
  3. Radio declines. 19% vs 32% in Houston.

For firms in other markets: Atlanta is the roadmap. What’s happening here will spread to other markets within 2-3 years. The firms building CTV capability now will have advantages when their markets shift.

For firms in Atlanta: The CTV arms race is on. Competing on traditional broadcast against Montlick and Morgan isn’t viable for smaller firms. But with 48% of spend on streaming, the audience is there, and household-level targeting can carve out niches the giants miss.

Ready to Get Started?

See how we can help your firm grow with CTV advertising and market intelligence.